DOE Website redesign

UXUI Design
Branding Design

Project overview

date

October 28, 2024

My role

UX Researcher, IA Designer, IxD Designer

Timeline

3 weeks

The U.S. Department of Education (DOE) website serves millions of users, providing critical information on student loans, grants, and educational resources. However, the outdated design and complex navigation made it difficult for users to find essential information efficiently. This UX/UI redesign project focused on streamlining the user experience, enhancing accessibility, and increasing engagement through a modern and intuitive interface.

What is the goal?

The goal was to redesign the DOE website to create a clear, structured, and accessible website that helps users quickly find information, apply for grants, and navigate student loan options. The redesign focused on improving usability, reducing confusion, and enhancing engagement, ensuring a seamless experience for students, parents, and educators.

Deliverable

  • User Research & Analysis – Identified pain points and usability issues.
  • Information Architecture Design – Developed a streamlined site structure.
  • UI & UX Redesign – Created high-fidelity wireframes and interactive prototypes.
  • Usability Testing – Validated the new design with real users.

What Stood in the Way?

challenge

The Problem

The U.S. Department of Education website is difficult to navigate, overwhelming users with complex menus, unclear terminology, and excessive information. This makes it hard for parents and students to find and understand crucial loan and grant details.

Solution

We redesigned the website to enhance navigation, accessibility, and content clarity. By streamlining menus, using clear language, improving search functionality, and restructuring the information architecture, we created a more user-friendly and efficient experience.

Design process

1. Research Phase
  • Usability testing
  • User persona
  • Define user path
  • Heuristic evaluation
  • Competitor analysis
  • Usability test
2. Ideation Phase
  • IA-card sorting
  • Sitemap
  • User flow
  • Wireframes
  • Mobile wireframe
  • UI style tile
3. Design Phase
  • UI Style guide
  • Mobile UI design
  • Desktop UI design
4. Test Phase
  • Usability plan
  • Usability test
  • Test Analysis

Assumption

Target User

Parents of Seniors Students.

User Needs

They need Support with college financial planning, like loans and grants, to ensure family stability, along with tools to stay engaged in their children’s education and manage work-life balance.

Design Challenge

How might we redesign the U.S. Department of Education website to create a more user-friendly, accessible platform for parents, students, and educators, ensuring easy access to critical information on student loans, grants, and educational resources?

Research

Research Method

  • Usability Testing
  • User Interviews: 1 on 1 interviews & Behavioral Interview
  • Heuristic Evaluation Analysis

Research Goal

To gain user insights on the usability and clarity of the U.S. Department of Education website. We aim to understand their challenges, preferences, and needs when accessing information on financial aid, grants, and educational resources.

Key Questions:

Navigation

  • How easy is it to find grant and loan information?
  • What sections or terms confuse you?

Content Organization

  • Is the information organized clearly?
  • Does the amount of information feel overwhelming?

Language & Accessibility

  • Are language options sufficient?
  • Do terms or steps seem unclear?

01. usability testing

Objective

  • Measure ease of navigation and clarity in each task.
  • Identify points of confusion or delays.
  • Gather user feedback on improvements for streamlined navigation and better information flow.

Key Tasks

  • Find Pell Grant Information: Locate and list steps for Pell Grant eligibility.
  • Get Started with Discretionary Grant Applications: Identify the process and total steps for starting a discretionary grant application.
  • Apply for a Grant: Navigate to the application section, find suitable grants, and initiate the application process.
DOE orginal website design

Key Takeaway

Users find it hard to navigate the U.S. Department of Education website due to confusing sections, too much text, and unclear links. Simplifying the navigation, adding clearer visuals, and making language settings easier to find can help users quickly access important information about grants and loans.

Navigation

Hard-to-find language settings, broken links, unclear paths, and overwhelming buttons/categories.

Information Clarity

Unclear terminology, and lack of concise explanations make it difficult for users to find relevant information quickly.

Information Overload

Heavy text, difficulty selecting correct links.

Visual Design

Distracting colors, lack of engaging icons/carousels.

External Links & Terminology

Confusing redirects, unfamiliar terms (e.g., FSA ID), translation challenges.

02. user persona

In our usability testing, we observed how users navigate the DOE website, especially when searching for financial aid information. Many struggled with confusing navigation, too much text, unclear differences between grants & loans, as well as overwelmed information. To better understand these challenges, we created Maria’s persona—a parent managing her child’s education finances, representing a key user group.

User persona

Maria Gomez, a 46-year-old office manager, seeks student loans and grants for her child's college expenses. She's tech-savvy and involved in her child's education but worries about the financial impact of debt and is unsure where to start with grants.

03. Empathy map

Maria’s challenges with managing college expenses and navigating financial options highlight the need for clear, simplified information on grants and loans. This insight informed our website redesign by focusing on:

  • Streamlined navigation for financial resources.
  • Easy-to-understand guidance on loans and grants.
  • Tools to plan and estimate costs effectively.
Empathy map

04. Competitor Analysis

Our competitor analysis by Patrick (team memeber) shows competitors use dynamic visuals but suffer from clutter or dullness. The redesign will focus on clear navigation, balanced visuals, and engaging aesthetics for a clean, user-friendly homepage.

An image of competitor analysis

Competitor analysis form by Patrick

05. heuristic evaluation analysis

Heruistic evaluation

The U.S. Department of Education website faces key usability and accessibility issues, including inconsistent navigation, excessive links, lack of error recovery in the search bar, missing alt text for images, poor color contrast, and inadequate accessibility features like WAI-ARIA attributes. Addressing these challenges with clearer navigation, simplified content, and accessibility improvements will enhance user experience and inclusivity.

The "Student Loans, Forgiveness" section struggles with jargon, inconsistent link styling, scattered information, and missing definitions. Accessibility issues include lack of alternative text, poor contrast, and insufficient ARIA attributes. Centralizing information and improving design and accessibility will greatly enhance usability.

Heruistic evaluation
Heruistic evaluation

The "Grants" section of the U.S. Department of Education website highlights several usability and accessibility issues. Usability concerns include jargon-heavy language, inconsistent link styling, a missing email icon, and uneven spacing in bullet points.

Accessibility gaps involve missing alternative text for buttons, insufficient guidance for external links, and the need for larger buttons to support users with mobility impairments. Addressing these problems with clearer language, consistent design, and accessibility improvements will significantly enhance the user experience.

06. user path

This wireflow shows the user path through the U.S. Department of Education website, focusing on accessing student loans and grant applications. Key observations from our UX/UI research include:

User pathy and navigation flow

07. initial usability test

We conducted usability testing to uncover navigation issues and confusing instructions in the grant application process. These insights helped us improve the website’s clarity, accessibility, and user experience.

A image of usability test plan 1A image of usability test plan 2

Usability testing plan

A image of usability test report

Usability testing report

Testing revealed confusing navigation, dense content, and visual distractions. Users struggled with broken links, unclear sections, and overwhelming text. These findings guided us to simplify navigation, reduce text, and improve visuals for a smoother user experience.

A image of user paint points

Pain points data

my Design Process

1

2

3

4

Ideation phase

Card Sorting

After synthesizing the initial usability data, we moved into the ideation phase to brainstorm design solutions within the project scope. This process allowed us to develop a clear and user-friendly structure for the website, ensuring users can easily find and understand information.

1. create cards & Shuffle

Random content cards were created for Student Loans, Grants, Homepage, and Footer sections. The cards were shuffled to eliminate bias.

2. group & Label

Participants grouped related cards and labeled categories. For example:

  • Student Loan Page: Application, Eligibility, Loan Management.
  • Grant Page: Introduction, Application Process, Grant Opportunities.
  • Homepage: Primary Navigation, Policies, Financial Aid.

3. structure

Groups were organized into a clear hierarchical structure:

  • Student Loans: Application, Eligibility, Services.
  • Grants: Educational Institutions Grant, Student Grant, Grant Policies.
A image of card sorting process for IA design

Card sorting process on Figjam with the team

Site Map & Information Architecture

This sitemap shows the restructured navigation for the U.S. Department of Education website. Key sections are clearly organized to improve user experience.

This structure simplifies navigation by grouping related content, making it easier for users to find loans, grants, and resources. The clear organization supports an intuitive experience, reduces confusion, and helps users access key information quickly.

An image depicting information architecture

Design Phase

Wireframes

As a team, we worked together to create the initial wireframes and designed simple interactions to quickly test usability.

An image of wireframes

Feedback

During this process, we noticed several important areas for improvement:

An image of feedback from the team

Iteration Phase

High-fidelity prototype

In the iteration phase of the DOE project, our team refined the designs based on feedback from the initial design phase and usability testing. We improved wireframes, streamlined navigation, and enhanced the interface to better meet the needs of students and educators.

This iterative process allowed us to optimize visual design and interactivity, delivering a more accessible and user-friendly experience.

Key updates included:

  • Top Navigation Bar: Enhanced visual prominence with improved hierarchy and contrast to ensure easier navigation.
  • Hero Banner: Incorporated interactive elements and a more dynamic design to increase engagement and functionality.
  • Press Release Section: Redesigned with clear visual distinctions to minimize accidental clicks and improve user flow.
  • Secretary of Education Section: Added clear visual cues for clickable areas to make interactions more intuitive.
  • Student Loan Page: Optimized button sizes and layout for better visual balance and efficient use of screen space.
An image of high fidelity prototype for the website

High fidelity prototypes

Mobile device design

These mobile wireframes are adapted from the desktop design, ensuring a seamless transition to smaller screens. Starting with desktop allows for establishing a clear information architecture and visual style, which are then streamlined for mobile. This approach ensures feature completeness, consistent branding, and an efficient, user-centered experience on all devices.

An image of mobile wireframesAn image of prototypes on mobile device

Color Palette

competitors

The Nittany Lions' primary colors are blue and white. The deep blue is often referred to as "Penn State Blue." The simplicity of the blue and white color scheme contributes to a clean and classic aesthetic. The team utilizes a clean typography style in their design materials, the design style of the Penn State football team is characterized by simplicity, tradition, and a focus on core elements.

The Buckeyes' primary colors are scarlet and gray, scarlet represents passion, energy, and strength while gray adds a touch of sophistication and balance, The team utilizes strong and bold typography in their design materials, design style embodies strength, tradition, and a sense of prestige.

The Wolverines' primary colors are maize (bright yellow) and blue. Maize is a distinctive color that symbolizes the University of Michigan and is instantly recognizable. The team utilizes classic and bold typography in their design materials. the design style of the football team is classic, elegant, and steeped in tradition.

Competitor analysis

The Nittany Lions' primary colors are blue and white. The deep blue is often referred to as "Penn State Blue." The simplicity of the blue and white color scheme contributes to a clean and classic aesthetic. The team utilizes a clean typography style in their design materials, the design style of the Penn State football team is characterized by simplicity, tradition, and a focus on core elements.

The Buckeyes' primary colors are scarlet and gray, scarlet represents passion, energy, and strength while gray adds a touch of sophistication and balance, The team utilizes strong and bold typography in their design materials, design style embodies strength, tradition, and a sense of prestige.

The Wolverines' primary colors are maize (bright yellow) and blue. Maize is a distinctive color that symbolizes the University of Michigan and is instantly recognizable. The team utilizes classic and bold typography in their design materials. the design style of the football team is classic, elegant, and steeped in tradition.

Typography

Draft

No items found.

Final Design

No items found.

Design Imapct

Key Takeaway

  • Improved Usability: Simplified navigation and clear structure enhance user experience.
  • Cohesive Design: Unified visuals foster trust and professionalism.
  • Accessibility First: Inclusive design meets accessibility standards.
  • User-Centered Approach: Research-driven solutions address user pain points.
  • Modern Look: Clean, professional aesthetic aligns with educational values.

Project link

View Live Website

Social media post

Printed Brochure

Back to Work